Tandra

Programs

An overview of how Tandra learns together

Regular

Every Sunday

Core sessions: neuroscience content, virtual labs, debates, and Neuro-News. All members attend.

Recitation

Optional sign-up

Optional deep-dives into the Regular material, with assignments, for members who want to go further.

On-Demand

As called

Called when the community needs them, always with advance notice.

The shape of ninety minutes

What actually happens in a session

A member presents a brain-science finding from the past week or so, in plain language, using analogies rather than jargon. Speakers are chosen at random from the group, which means everyone arrives having read something. It is the hardest part of the session and the part members improve at fastest.

New material, or a continuation of the previous week, delivered with slides and stopped constantly for questions. This is the closest thing Tandra has to a lecture, and it is deliberately the shortest part.

Breakout rooms. Depending on the week: a virtual wet lab, a structured debate, a game, or a case study. Small groups, everyone talking, nobody watching.

A short Kahoot covering the day's material or anything from previous weeks. It is competitive, it is not graded, and nothing depends on it.

That is the usual shape, and it changes regularly — some weeks are entirely debate, some are built around a single case. The structure exists to make sure that by the end of ninety minutes, everyone has said something. These sessions are as much about building a group that thinks together as they are about the material.

The point of all this

Where six months should get you

  • Read a research paper and work out whether you believe it.
  • Recognise the main methods used in brain science, and know what each one can and cannot tell you.
  • Form a hypothesis and design an experiment that would actually test it.
  • Explain something difficult to someone who does not already understand it.
  • Say what is currently known, what is contested, and where the edges are.

None of these are qualifications. They are things you will be able to do, which is a different kind of thing to have.

What we work with

The tools, and what each one is for

LabXchange

Curated virtual courses and hands-on lab simulations. You will spin a centrifuge, use a light microscope, and run procedures you would otherwise never get near.

Neurotorium

A repository of brain-science material, and a 3D brain atlas we explore live together — finding structures, mapping what they do, arguing about the boundaries.

BrainFacts.org

Reliable, readable background material, maintained by the Society for Neuroscience. A good place to start on almost anything.

Franklin Institute

Accessible explainers on how the brain works, pitched at people meeting the material for the first time.

Allen Brain Atlas

A research-grade atlas of gene expression and connectivity. Genuinely difficult, and used by advanced learners.

Planned

The Virtual Brain — simulation of neural transmission at the network level. Not part of the current programme; we intend to bring it in as members get further.

Neuro-ethics

A question with no comfortable answer

A brain–computer interface has to learn you before it can work. Over weeks of calibration, the system builds a decoder — a piece of software that maps your particular neural patterns onto intentions, so that thinking about moving a cursor actually moves it. Everybody's brain signals are different, so every decoder is different. Yours works on exactly one brain in the world.

Now suppose a better device is released, by a different company. To switch, you would have to start calibration from nothing: weeks of training, and in the meantime you lose whatever the first device gave you back.

Should the company be required to hand over your decoder when you leave?

The company built the decoder. It is their software, their engineering, their investment — and handing it to a competitor hands over their work.

But the decoder is not really software about a general problem. It is a description of you. And a decoder you cannot take with you is not a product you bought; it is a condition of staying with one supplier, enforced by the cost of relearning your own body.

There is a defensible position here, and a careful person can reach one. Most people's first answer is not it.

Straight answer

What we ask of you

Show up, on time.

Sessions start when they start. If you cannot make one, say so beforehand — that is all it takes.

Take part.

Watching is not participating. You will be asked what you think, and “I don't know” is a fine answer as long as it is honest.

Do your own work.

Use whatever tools help you learn, including AI. Do not hand in something you did not think through.

Be straight with us.

If something is not working — the timing, the material, your connection — say it early. We can work with almost anything except silence.

Enjoy it.

This is voluntary and it is supposed to be interesting. If it stops being either, tell us that too.

We ask more of members than most free programmes do. That is on purpose. The room is only worth being in if everyone in it has decided to be there.

The three stages

Learner, Contributor, Leader

Learner

You attend the weekly meetings, opt into recitations when a topic grabs you, ask questions, and build the habit of thinking scientifically. Neuro-News starts here — every member presents.

Contributor

You start using what you know. Leading discussions, mentoring newer members, and joining Tandra's outward-facing work: podcasts, video, workshops, and projects that leave the meeting room.

Leader

You run your own thing. A science club at your school, an outreach programme in your area, or an initiative of your own design. Tandra backs it with its network and support — the shape is yours to decide, as long as it puts scientific thinking in front of people who did not have it.

Still have questions?

Ask us directly. We read everything that comes in.

Get in touch →